9 February 2019 at 6:44 pm #554944
I don’t want to start a row but…
Who could not have Aprons on their bench because they clamp things to the bench top at the front?
I’m going to build a new bench. I currently have my old holtzapffel style bench which had a mid height rail at the front for holding work. I originally had a leg vise on it but found it slow and didn’t get on with the parallel guide. I changed this for a qr record type vise and stuck a plank accross the front making an adhoc apron. I have drilled holes in the top and use dogs and holdfasts.
Here’s the thing. I’ve seen all Paul’s bench video’s andd work holding video’s. I’ve got Maguires videos on his English and also the rather wonderful Siemsen bench video and plans as well as his workholding video.
I’ve got an old copy of Landis’s bench book and Shwartz’s second bench book.
Shwartz, in particular seems to dislike aprons claiming you can’t clamp stuff to the bench. But he also uses holfasts.
I ask again, if I make a bench with Aprons what could I be missing out on?
To me the advantage of being able to sweep the floor without bearers seems to be an advantage too.9 February 2019 at 8:30 pm #554945
I’m not up to speed with all the bench styles you mention so i hope I’ve understood your question Rowdy Whaleback but when I made my tweeked version of Pauls bench I laminated a rail (75x45mm timber) on the front and back aprons so I could clamp onto these. If I work out how to attach a photo I’ll post one. Admittedly Paul has said somewhere that he never felt the need for such.
You must be logged in to access attached files.9 February 2019 at 8:50 pm #554948
I can’t answer your question, but will give you my thoughts on work benches. FWIW…
I think the Shwartz iteration of the Roubo bench is the best bench for my purpose. And one day I will build one.
I intended to build the ‘garden’ version of Paul’s bench and was about to begin when he teased the smaller version. So I built it instead. I reasoned that I could build it quicker, get on to some projects and then use it to build the Roubo bench. I installed a vise as per Paul’s design and also drilled the top and use holdfasts. I do clamp to the front of the bench just as Paul does using the same type of clamps. When I build the Roubo bench it will have the sliding dead man instead of the apron. Both serve the same purpose.
The stretchers mortised into the legs and the legs dovetailed into the top make the Roubo a more challenging build and are more time consuming to complete. Paul’s ingenious wedged leg design was fun to build and works perfectly.
So pick a design and go for it!!!
9 February 2019 at 10:20 pm #554950
- This reply was modified 6 months, 1 week ago by P McC.
Thanks for the responses. Just to be clear Shwartz seems to be talking about using the underside of the roubo to clamp pieces down onto the top Around the edges. Jcat your add ons do work for this but what for?
I can’t think of any reason for having to do this. Shwartz uses a Moxon vise and clamps that. I built a bench on bench which is similar but use holdfasts from the top. Don’t see why you can’t do that. Planing doesn’t seem a reason, neither does making mouldings…9 February 2019 at 10:54 pm #554951
I’ve clamped pieces to the bench top in the matter you speak of. I intend to build a Moxon vise and would clamp that as well. I’d miss being able to do that, but there’s usually work-arounds to accomplish the same thing.
If you can't afford to do big things...........do small things in a big way!9 February 2019 at 11:11 pm #554952
I clamp my Moxon-type vise to the front edge of the bench using bar clamps anchored to the bottom edge of the apron. Apron is 12″ wide. Works just fine. No rail needed.
10 February 2019 at 12:55 am #554955
- This reply was modified 6 months, 1 week ago by P McC.
I clamp my Moxon-type vise to the front edge of the bench using bar clamps anchored to the bottom edge of the apron. Apron is 12″ wide. Works just fine. No rail needed.[/quote]
Well of course you could! Sometimes I can’t see the forest for the trees. LOL
OK …….now that you mentioned having a Moxon type vise, do you fine it useful? I’m thinking I would. My bench top is at 34″ since it’s also the outfield for my table saw and the extra height of the Moxon would be nice for some operations. Of course I could always build one of Pauls benches at 38″ to use as my “back bench”! Hmmmmm!
If you can't afford to do big things...........do small things in a big way!10 February 2019 at 2:48 am #554956
Planing doesn’t seem a reason, neither does making mouldings…
It is if you use bench dogs near the front edge with a tail vise to hold the stock you are moulding.
I can hold stock as narrow as 3/4” at the front edge for use with a moving fillester plane followe by hollows and rounds without resorting to a sticking board. ( though more often I stick the moulding then cut it off wider stock.)
With a deep apron you can’t push the dogs up.
There are lots of ways people like to hold work, all of them valid, but wide aprons aren’t compatible with all of them.10 February 2019 at 7:25 am #554961
Sorry if I haven’t understood the question, I thought you wanted ideas for having an apron and a method of clamping to the front, the “what for” was your department.
In my case I use my bench for everything, be it assembly, woodwork, home maintenance, mower repairs etc, metalwork and welding (with a sheet metal cover) and you will also note my bench is a flat top, wells don’t work for me. Also I don’t use dogs yet, I want too but I don’t want to drill holes in my pretty bench!! I use those rails for clamping all sorts of things including planing wide boards and sheet materials too. It gives me options and versatility considering my type of bench (no well, etc) and what tools and equipment I have available.
There is never only one way of doing things plus I enjoy trialing and experimenting, hence the tweaked Paul Sellers workbench,( so far so good;-) )
Cheers10 February 2019 at 11:31 am #554962
I think the use of dogs can be difficult with deep aprons. I don’t keep mine in so get a lot of dust underneath the bench. Also if one does get pushed down trying to reach under it is awkward. I suppose the planing stop used in conjuction with a holdfast and doe’s foot os the answer there.
I’ve tried Pauls technique using cramps but found that the aluminium ones flex too much if I’m hogging material off a 3/4” board, like the toolbox sides. I’m going to have a go with the bolt on jobs where you use a piece of 25mm thick wood with drilled holes.
When we set out to design and build a bench we invest a lot of time money and thought so I thank you all for your patient, experienced advice.
10 February 2019 at 3:58 pm #554964
- This reply was modified 6 months, 1 week ago by Rowdy Whaleback.
My new bench has a wagon vise, round dog holes and a 3 1/2″ front edge. I have a set of brass dogs (because they look so cool) and a Veritas Surface Clamp. However, I’m also doing to turn some drop in dogs of various heights. I already did a practice one and they’re going to work great.
If you can't afford to do big things...........do small things in a big way!
10 February 2019 at 9:33 pm #554967
- This reply was modified 6 months, 1 week ago by Jim Thornton.
I’m pretty confused by the verbiage in the OP, but the bottom line is that excellent workbenches can be made with or without aprons.
For an example of workbenches with no aprons that have stood the test of time and seen generations of heavy use, you can peruse the style of workbenches at the Hancock Shaker Village in Massachusetts. Here are some detailed pictures taken by a woodworker who visited: http://lumberjocks.com/topics/123778
When Fine Woodworking made their dream bench, it was this style of Shaker bench they chose, and they obviously could have chosen any style whatsoever.
I personally prefer this style as well, and so do Lie Nielsen and Sjobergs, so clearly aprons are not needed for great workbenches. However, there are just as many examples of time-tested workbenches with aprons, such as those mentioned above. The apron design allows efficient racking resistance without the need to have a massive benchtop, and creates opportunities for easy clamping in the Z axis. Non-apron designs tend to rely on a massive benchtop and / or massive base for racking resistance. An apron blocks space that could be used for lots of drawers or shelves, but as Paul shows, a small number of drawers can still be added through the apron.
If this is your first bench, I wouldn’t worry about it. You’ll be fine either way, and you can always just build a different bench later, and re-use the wood from the first bench in the second bench or other projects.11 February 2019 at 3:00 am #554969
The OP states in his original post that he’s going to build a new bench to replace his old bench. He’s just trying to figure out if building a bench like Paul’s, with its a large from apron, is going to create difficulties clamping pieces to the benchtop. I guess the answer is to imagine doing the type of projects and operations one does and see if one design or another works best for oneself.
You are absolutely correct about lots of great bench designs out there. I’m just finishing up a new Holtzapffel style bench (didn’t even know that’s what I was building until I googled the term). That said……. I’m also thinking about building Paul’s plywood bench design to check out the style, since I have 3 sheets of quality plywood sitting around from past projects. All it’ll cost me is the price of a quick release vise.
If you can't afford to do big things...........do small things in a big way!11 February 2019 at 8:16 am #554970
To clarify the question: Chris Shwartz roundly dismisses aprons because they prevent clamping to the top of the bench top. Which activities do you find such clamping absolutely indispensable?
My reason for asking is that I don’t have an electric router, haven’t made a chair and so on…11 February 2019 at 11:10 am #554974
Ahhhhh, “INDISPENSABLE”, I do use an electric trim router from time to time which clamping to the bench top helps quite a bit but indispensable?? Nah, there are always other ways of doing things and work a rounds. If that’s the reason for not to having aprons, I would say more lateral thinking please, build your aprons and enjoy them
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.